Here are my favourite easy ways to fill up five minutes with no preparation required.
Getting to know you warmers and fillers
1. True, true, lie. Students write some sentences about themselves. Some are true and some are lies. Then they mingle and can ask one another questions to find out which are lies.
2. CV interview. Draw up the basic structure of a CV on the board. Students in pairs interview each other to make each other's CV.
3. Guess the question. Write some words that are connected to you on the board (eg. your favourite sport, pet's name, age...). Make some easy and some harder. Explain that these are the answers to some questions about you. Students have to guess the questions. Students then do the same for themselves and guess the questions in small groups.
4. What am I like? Students write a few sentences about themselves on a piece of paper. (Tell them not to write about appearance or clothes as this will make it too easy.) Jumble up the papers and redistribute. Students then mingle and ask questions to find out who wrote their paper.
5. Same or different? Write up some sentence starters on the board. (Eg. My favourite place is... A colour that makes me feel good is... My favourite time of day is... I couldn't live without my... When I have free time I like to... I'm looking forward to...) Students complete for themselves and then compare in groups of 2-3. Encourage discussion. Each group feeds back to the class on something they have in common and something they disagree on.
Vocabulary and spelling warmers and fillers
6. Prefixes brainstorm. Put students into small teams. Each team must appoint one writer who will make the list. The team who can list the most correct examples in 2 minutes wins the game. Suggestions: pre-, int-, con-, dis-, mis-, un-, uni-, ob-, mono-, omni-...
7. Suffixes brainstorm. Procedure as above. Suggestions: -able, -ful, -ous, -tion, -sion, -ance, -ity, -ic, -ism, -ive...
8. Words with X number of letters brainstorm. For low levels, start with 4 or 5. Higher levels, more letters. Points are only awarded for correctly spelled words.
9. Rhymes brainstorm. Students in teams have 2 minutes to list words that rhyme with the word you give.
10. Categories brainstorm. This can be good if you split the class into two teams and they make their lists on the board. The team that can list the most in 2 minutes wins. Points are only awarded for correctly spelled words. Clothes, jobs, animals, foods, countries...
11. Shapes quiz. Draw some shapes on the board (circle, oval, triangle, square, rectangle, pentagon, hexagon, octagon...) and students in small groups write down their answers. Include some shapes they will know, and some you think they won't know.
12. Spelling race. Good for revising vocabulary from a previous lesson, or spellings that students persistently get wrong. Divide the class into two; one player from each team must write up the word you call out. First team with the correct spelling gets the point.
13. Back spelling. Arrange students in two lines facing the board and give a word to the two students at the back. They must tell the word to the person in front of them but are not allowed to say anything. Instead they must spell out the word by using their finger like a pencil on the next person's back. First team to accurately pass the word to the front of the line gets the point.
14. Word chain. Students are in two teams. Give a first word and students must continue with a word that starts with the last letter of that word (eg. cat-table-egg). This can be done on the board and the team with the longest chain after two minutes wins. Make it more difficult if the students can handle it by specifying a category. Alternatively, use a ball and play the game orally. A student from one team says the first word, then tosses the ball to a player on the other team who must give the next word. If a student can't think of a word or repeats one that has already been said, they are out of the game.
15. Geography quiz. Use any facts you know off the top of your head. (What is the capital city of... what is the currency of... which language is spoken in... what colours are on the flag of...)
16. Smartphone challenge. Challenge the learners to research specific items of vocabulary using their smartphones. For example, give a list of animals and learners must find the word for the baby animal (cat/kitten, horse/foal, bear/cub...), or a group of animals (sheep/flock, lion/pride, shoal/fish...). My students are usually excited to be allowed to use their phones in class for once. They can do this in groups and the first team to find all the words is the winner.
Grammar warmers and fillers
17. Verb forms revision. Students in small teams; each team has a small whiteboard, if available (paper if not). Call out a verb and students have to write the form that you specify (past simple, past participle...). The first team to write the correct form and hold up their whiteboard gets the point.
18. Present passive practice. Write up the structure "_____ is made from _____". Students in small groups have to make as many sentences as they can using that structure, but cannot use a word more than once. (Paper is made from wood, cheese is made from milk...) Set a time limit of about 3 minutes.
19. Grammar noughts and crosses. Draw a 3x3 grid on the board and write a word in each square. Students are in two teams. Decide which team goes first by coin toss or drawing straws. To take a square, the team must make a sentence with at least 10 words using the word in that square and the grammar structure you specify. If they cannot, it is the other team's turn.
Listening and pronunciation warmers and fillers
20. Minimal pairs race. Write up lots of minimal pairs in a random cloud on the board. For example ship/sheep, eyes/ice, my/might... Divide the class into two teams. Call out a word and one player from each team has to touch the word you said (or circle it with a pen if you prefer). The first to get the correct word wins a point.
21. Numbers race. Same as above but write up lots of numbers.
22. Shopping list memory game. Read out your shopping list with about 15 items. Students are not allowed to write while you talk. Then they make a list afterwards to see how many they can remember.
23. Running dictation. Divide students into pairs and stick a short reading text on the wall on the other side of the classroom. One student will be the runner and the other will be the writer.
24. Shouting dictation. If you don't have the space for a running dictation, have pairs standing or seated a few feet away from each other and one dictates to the other by shouting. Use different sections of text so that one student doesn't end up shouting for all the others.
Showing posts with label pronunciation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pronunciation. Show all posts
Monday, 22 September 2014
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
See or she? - common problems for Cambodian learners of English
Cambodian learners of English as a foreign language are prone to struggle with certain specific aspects of pronunciation and grammar, due to lack of equivalent features in the Khmer language. There are other more general problems to overcome when using Western-oriented study materials due to cultural differences. I will describe the specific difficulties I have experienced here.
Like learners from other Asian countries, Cambodian learners struggle to produce certain sounds. The main difficulties are with fricative consonants (those that are pronounced by forcing air between two parts of the mouth, for example the bottom lip and teeth). The /ʃ/ sound (sh as in sheep) does not exist in the Khmer language and so learners will tend to produce /s/ instead. Likewise, they will be unfamiliar with the sounds /θ/ and /ð/ (soft and hard th as in thing and this) and tend to pronounce them as /t/ and /d/ respectively. The /v/ sound also causes trouble, and Cambodian learners will tend to produce /w/ instead. Finally the /ʒ/ (as in television) is hard for the learners to produce.
In addition to individual phonemes causing general pronunciation problems, final consonants or clusters of consonants tend to cause difficulty. For example, learners generally don't have a problem pronouncing /ʧ/ at the start of a word (like the ch in cheese) but will have trouble with it at the end of a word (such as beach). This is due to a feature of the Khmer language, where the final consonant in a word is only partially articulated (similar to British English 'dropping' of the final /t/ in words such as beat). As a result, learners may not fully pronounce final consonants, or may drop them altogether.
The other main area of difficulty with pronunciation is linking between syllables. Cambodian learners tend to define each individual syllable quite sharply, leading to a staccato pronunciation. For example, the Cambodian learner's natural inclination will be to pronounce 'going' as /gəʊ ɪŋ/ rather than /gəʊwɪŋ/. In addition, the English language's variable and sometimes sing-song intonation can sound strange to the learners who are used to a narrower range of modulation.
English grammar poses a particular problem to Cambodian learners, much like speakers of other Asian languages whose structure is completely different from that of English. Many features of English and other European languages simply have no equivalent in the Khmer language. For example, there are no definite or indefinite articles; verbs do not conjugate according to gender or number; tenses are indicated by context or by adding time words; and there are no plural forms for nouns. Subject pronouns can be omitted if the context makes it clear who the subject is, and possession is generally indicated by using the personal pronoun after the noun. As a result, a sentence such as "Yesterday stay house I" would be grammatically correct if translated word-to-word back into the Khmer language. In writing, the final 's' is often omitted from plurals, possessives and third-person singular verbs; however it is hard to know whether this stems from pronunciation difficulties or grammar difficulties. Learners may alternatively hypercorrect by adding 's' where it is not needed.
Apart from pronunciation and grammar, there can be difficulties when trying to use Western-oriented study materials with Cambodian learners. The most obvious problem is that the material in Oxford/Cambridge textbooks is often culturally irrelevant, dealing with topics or situations which are completely alien. The material in certain textbooks assumes prior knowledge about historical figures or events which are only widely known to a Western student base, so a pre-lesson explanation needs to be done before the material can actually be used. What we might assume is 'general knowledge' may be completely new to the learners. This may be because Cambodian society is fairly insular and does not have a strong 'reading culture'. As another result of this, learners may find it very challenging to read fiction or longer texts.
To conclude, Cambodian learners understandably have various different types of difficulty with the English language. However, awareness of the problem is part of the solution, and the problems can be successfully overcome with care and attention on the part of both teacher and student.
Like learners from other Asian countries, Cambodian learners struggle to produce certain sounds. The main difficulties are with fricative consonants (those that are pronounced by forcing air between two parts of the mouth, for example the bottom lip and teeth). The /ʃ/ sound (sh as in sheep) does not exist in the Khmer language and so learners will tend to produce /s/ instead. Likewise, they will be unfamiliar with the sounds /θ/ and /ð/ (soft and hard th as in thing and this) and tend to pronounce them as /t/ and /d/ respectively. The /v/ sound also causes trouble, and Cambodian learners will tend to produce /w/ instead. Finally the /ʒ/ (as in television) is hard for the learners to produce.
In addition to individual phonemes causing general pronunciation problems, final consonants or clusters of consonants tend to cause difficulty. For example, learners generally don't have a problem pronouncing /ʧ/ at the start of a word (like the ch in cheese) but will have trouble with it at the end of a word (such as beach). This is due to a feature of the Khmer language, where the final consonant in a word is only partially articulated (similar to British English 'dropping' of the final /t/ in words such as beat). As a result, learners may not fully pronounce final consonants, or may drop them altogether.
The other main area of difficulty with pronunciation is linking between syllables. Cambodian learners tend to define each individual syllable quite sharply, leading to a staccato pronunciation. For example, the Cambodian learner's natural inclination will be to pronounce 'going' as /gəʊ ɪŋ/ rather than /gəʊwɪŋ/. In addition, the English language's variable and sometimes sing-song intonation can sound strange to the learners who are used to a narrower range of modulation.
English grammar poses a particular problem to Cambodian learners, much like speakers of other Asian languages whose structure is completely different from that of English. Many features of English and other European languages simply have no equivalent in the Khmer language. For example, there are no definite or indefinite articles; verbs do not conjugate according to gender or number; tenses are indicated by context or by adding time words; and there are no plural forms for nouns. Subject pronouns can be omitted if the context makes it clear who the subject is, and possession is generally indicated by using the personal pronoun after the noun. As a result, a sentence such as "Yesterday stay house I" would be grammatically correct if translated word-to-word back into the Khmer language. In writing, the final 's' is often omitted from plurals, possessives and third-person singular verbs; however it is hard to know whether this stems from pronunciation difficulties or grammar difficulties. Learners may alternatively hypercorrect by adding 's' where it is not needed.
Apart from pronunciation and grammar, there can be difficulties when trying to use Western-oriented study materials with Cambodian learners. The most obvious problem is that the material in Oxford/Cambridge textbooks is often culturally irrelevant, dealing with topics or situations which are completely alien. The material in certain textbooks assumes prior knowledge about historical figures or events which are only widely known to a Western student base, so a pre-lesson explanation needs to be done before the material can actually be used. What we might assume is 'general knowledge' may be completely new to the learners. This may be because Cambodian society is fairly insular and does not have a strong 'reading culture'. As another result of this, learners may find it very challenging to read fiction or longer texts.
To conclude, Cambodian learners understandably have various different types of difficulty with the English language. However, awareness of the problem is part of the solution, and the problems can be successfully overcome with care and attention on the part of both teacher and student.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)